FATCA Technical Reporting Questions and Answers

  1. Registration

a.     Will we be required to register our IRS-registered entities with the ATO?

No.

  1. Nil reports

a.     Will we be permitted or required to submit nil reports?

Nil reports are permitted to be submitted but the submission is not mandatory. Please refer to the IRS website for information.

b.    Will the ATO be producing an Online Manual Entry Report for financial institutions that do not have an XML to submit or for NIL reports?

No.

  1. Thresholds
    1. Will we have to advise the ATO if we have applied thresholds? If so, how will we do this?

No. Please note, however, the requirements in Division 396 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 in relation to record-keeping.

  1. File transmission

a.     Can the ATO confirm the schema required and how to upload files, e.g. web-based?

The schema required is the FATCA XML Schema version advertised on the IRS web site, currently version 1.1.

FATCA reports (in XML format) should be completed by the financial institution then uploaded to the ATO via the Business Portal/Tax Agent Portal (using AUSkey for authentication). The ATO will validate the uploaded report and provide a Failed Validation report or a Successful Lodgement report to the sender via the submission portal.

    1. Will the ATO align with the IRS FATCA XML Schema version 1.1 and provide the same schema validations as per the IRS specification when financial institutions submit to the ATO?

Yes, broadly. However, the ATO will be applying some additional levels of logical validation to the lodged files. For example:

Generic checks such as:

a)     checking for malware, and

b)    checking for duplicate lodgement

Content validation such as:

a)     checking date appropriateness

b)    checking supplied code or value against a set of values

These should be communicated to industry in the near future.

 

c.     Will the ATO amend the MessageRefID element (within the message header of the FATCA XML) to ensure uniqueness across Australian reporters?  In the IRS publication 5189, section 1.3 FATCA Notification Overview, it states that duplicate MessageRefID’s will be rejected.

No.  The ATO will not modify or replace the MessageRefID value supplied by financial institutions.

It is recommended that financial institutions use MessageRefID values that would distinguish messages from other messages previously sent (and accepted by the IRS) and from any other financial institution message.

d.    Do we need to encrypt files prior to lodging?

No. Please do not encrypt files prior to lodging as the ATO will do the encryption work as part of its dispatching process.

e.     Can we submit multiple Reporting Financial Institution reports on the one file with a header/trailer between each one or does it have to be separate?

The FATCA XML schema allows for the reporting of multiple Reporting Financial Institutions on the one file. Please consult the IRS schema instructions for details.

f.     Will the reporting framework allow lodgement of multiple report files for a single financial institution (for example if a single financial institution operates a number of different businesses, potentially managed by different platforms/service providers) or will these reports need to be consolidated?

Financial institutions are not prevented from lodging multiple report files (i.e. by a single financial institution). The ATO encourages financial institutions to give some consideration to an appropriate naming convention for files transferred to the ATO.

g.    Does the ATO have a naming convention for FATCA files?

Financial institutions can use any file naming convention they prefer, however, it is recommended that financial institutions use a name that would distinguish lodgements from other files previously lodged and, ideally, from any other financial institution lodgements.

For example:

FI_FATCA_2015_001.xml or FI_FATCA_2015_001.zip

where FI is an abbreviation of the financial institution’s name  

 

h.     Will the ATO communicate via their submission portal or via email for corrected and amended reports or any other queries relating to the reports?

If validation is unsuccessful, the lodgement will be rejected and the reporter notified via a Failed Validation report posted on the submission portal. The submitted file will be discarded. The reporter must correct the error(s) and re-lodge the report.

If validation is successful the reporter will be notified via a Successful Lodgement report posted on the submission portal. The file will be encrypted then passed to the IRS.

In regard to follow-up action or ATO contact with financial institutions following, for example, rejection at the IDES system or IRS processing, this is expected to be via email or other means to be advised.

i.      Will any of the supplied values be validated for format and/or content? If so, what?

Please refer to question a). Some validation rules are built into the IRS schema, and some additional logical validation rules to be advised in the near future will be applied by the ATO. ATO validation rules will check the consistency of the supplied information but there will be no checks as to the accuracy of the information.

j.      How will the ATO provide a receipt that the report submission has been successful, e.g. via email or submission acknowledged on screen at time of submission?

The ATO will provide a standard portal validation report at time of lodgement into the submission portal. Emails, or other means to be advised, will be used for all communications from the IRS.

k.     How will rejected files be resent the entire file or just the customer/accounts in error?

When a file lodged to the ATO fails ATO validation, the entire file is rejected and discarded. That file must be corrected then re‑lodged.

If the ATO has accepted a successful lodgement but is later advised of an error in the file by the IRS under Article 5 of the FATCA Agreement, the IRS should advise whether they require a correction or an amendment transaction. During a correction the previous details are completely replaced by the new submission. When an amendment is made only the amending data element is used to replace the original data element value.

ATO will communicate the issue notified by the IRS to the reporter by email (or other means to be advised). The reporter will then either submit a new corrected file or submit corrections to a previously submitted file.

l.      Will there be a due date for posting corrections or amendments for each reporting year?

The due date may be advised as part of the notification received from the IRS. Please consult IRS guidance.

m.   What types of corrections will be requested by the ATO to FIs?

The ATO will request correction of FATCA reports which fail their validation checks. See response to question 4.b).

The ATO may receive a notification from the IRS that a FATCA report contains minor errors or in relation to compliance issues under Article 5 of the FATCA Agreement. The IRS notification will be communicated to the reporting financial institution for their attention. Requests for corrections may relate to various issues including file corruption, viruses, information errors or significant non‑compliance.

n.     If a correction or amendment to a submitted report post 31 July 2015 occurs does the ATO report these amendments in the following year?

Files will be passed on to the IRS as we receive them. The ATO does not store, hold or use the data in the FATCA report.

When a FATCA report is successfully lodged, the file will be immediately passed through to the IRS, with one exception: when the transmission channel is unavailable the FATCA reports will be stored until the channel becomes available then the FATCA reports will be transmitted in the order in which they were received.

o.    Can the ATO confirm it will align with the IRS FATCA XML Schema version 1.1 for correcting and amending submitted reports where they will only require the delta with a cross reference to the initially submitted report?

Yes, the ATO will adhere to the IRS FATCA schema instructions. If the lodged amendment is schema compliant it will be passed through to the IRS. See responses to questions 4.b) and 4.i).

p.    What will be the process if a file is rejected by the IRS?

If a file is rejected for technical reasons the ATO technical team will resend the file.

If the file is rejected for business reasons, for example a data error or a compliance issue, the IRS will notify the ATO and the ATO will communicate the issue to the reporter by email (or other means to be advised).The sender must take the action requested by the IRS then resend the file, either as a correction or an amendment. See response to question 4.i).

q.    Will the ATO align with IRS IDES specifications to allow a zipped file size of 200MB to be submitted?

Yes.

    1. Is it the intention of the ATO to use a similar submission system as used by AIIR?

Yes, if the question is referring to a FATCA XML schema compliant file lodged to the ATO (unencrypted) via the Business or Tax Agent portals and processed through BDE. Please see response to question 4.a).

  1. Testing

a.     When will testing commence?

At this stage testing is likely to be available around 13 May 2015 for financial institution to ATO lodgement.. Software developers can register for testing via the following link http://softwaredevelopers.ato.gov.au/ATO-ebMS3_subscription_to_EVTE

b.    What will you require from us?

You will be able to do a pre-lodge validation test through the portal (please refer to ATO Software Industry Liaison Unit (SILU) website as standard functionality).

ATO end-to-end testing with the IRS IDES and backend processing system is yet to be determined.

c.     What will be the duration of testing?

To be advised but expected to last at least 30 days.

  1. Pooled Reporting

a.     The NZ IRD has advised that recalcitrant account holders can be reported via the pool report data elements. Will the ATO be expecting the same or can these be reported via the Account Report data elements (until such time as TIN is mandatory)?

The ATO understands that there will be no pooled reporting under Model 1 FATCA agreements, including the Australia-US FATCA Agreement.

Under the Model 1 FATCA Agreement, recalcitrant accounts are to be reported as US Reportable Accounts in the Account Report data elements.

  1. Other

a.     NPFFI reporting are there any changes to the above responses regarding formats/mechanisms for reporting?

We have a single approach for all FATCA reporting.